>Posted by Josh Goldstein aka Mr. Provocative
It is striking to a regular reader of microfinance books and articles how little global poverty is analyzed in terms of class differences and “man-made” political inequality. Indeed it appears to be very nearly absent from the literature.
The lack of discussion about the root causes of poverty is surprising but perhaps an understandable backlash against the cold war era when simplistic Marxist analysis of capitalism as the evil behind every planetary woe–including the great divide between the haves and the have-nots–gave the search for causation a bad name. Is it a mere coincidence that the rise of a “grassroots capitalism” (aka microfinance—the provision of small amounts of capital to the self-employed poor) as a new approach to poverty reduction, came at a time when Marxism as an ideology was increasingly seen as a catastrophic failure? The two great Communist giants, the Soviet Union and China (along with their proxies) had failed to surpass, let alone equal—the living standards of people in the Western capitalist democracies. By the mid-eighties, after a decade of growing disillusionment, a bipolar world had lost one of its poles and the “hegemony” of capitalism seemed beyond dispute.
To the founding mothers and fathers of microcredit in the late seventies (many of them disillusioned lefties, who had morphed into reluctant capitalists) focusing on the “why” of inequality was unhelpful and stood in the way of a pragmatic approach to economic empowerment.
Never mind spending time trying to identify the complex social forces and entrenched interests that condemned the “masses” to poverty. Challenging the government or local elites to address underlying structural inequality of an unjust society was a waste of time, as the many revolutions in the fifties and sixties to end colonialism seemed to prove.
The mantra was beautiful in its simplicity: bring the building blocks of capitalism to the poor masses and economic empowerment and budding prosperity will follow. It all seemed very Horatio or (Henrietta) Alger—self employed masses of the world pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Your future prosperity is up to you.
Have you read?
The Cell Phone Revolution and My Friend Hector
What Really Works (And What Clearly Doesn’t)
Cuba & Remittances: Can the ‘Money in the Mail’ Drive Reform?


Facebook
Twitter
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
August 9, 2012 at 7:07 pm
jeffmowatt
The lack of discussion, in my experience is not due to the absence of those willing to talk about this issue, it has a lot more to do with censorship.
In 2003, with a fast for economic rights in the US, our founder was invisible because mainstream media simply didn’t want to hear. Later it became a kind of third sector hegemony. I remember for example being blocked and remaining blocked from a network on business fighting poverty for raising the topic of corruption and organised crime.
8 years ago in the UK we were drawing attention to the failure of capitalism and the risk of uprisings by those disenfranchised. It was very much a case of “not invented here”.
http://economics4humanity.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/capitalism-is-an-insufficient-economic-model/