For China’s young microfinance sector, which could benefit from more regulatory oversight and transparency, ratings have the potential to catalyze healthy growth. Efforts to incorporate ratings throughout the country’s market, however, have so far been largely ineffectual. A new report from PlaNet Finance China and Planet Rating, The Role of Microfinance Ratings in the Sustainable Development of China’s Financial Inclusion Sector, part of PlaNet Finance and Credit Suisse’s “Microfinance Robustness Program”, outlines how ratings could provide welcome growth and strengthening for Chinese microfinance, and describes the current obstacles that stand in the way.

Mainstream ratings systems evaluate creditworthiness of debt and financial products for companies. They also contribute to setting benchmarks for the wider financial services industry. Specialized microfinance rating agencies evaluate some of the same qualities traditional rating agencies do, but they are trained in microfinance and investigate other financial inclusion-specific indicators, such as social performance. Microfinance ratings function as institutional ratings, not credit ratings, as in the case of mainstream ratings. These more nuanced ratings for the microfinance sector first emerged in Latin America, where microfinance boomed in the late 1990s.

In the Latin American region, ratings armed investors, government leaders, and other stakeholders with a clearer picture of the microfinance landscape, eventually leading to increased debt funding and growth-conducive policy. Today, Peru, Colombia, and Chile feature robust microfinance markets, as suggested by their ranking among the top five countries for financially inclusive environments in the 2014 Global Microscope from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). While ratings are far from the whole story of success in Latin American microfinance, they made – and continue to make – important contributions.

In China, there has been an expansion in the number and type of institutions serving the base of the pyramid. For instance, policy initiatives have encouraged traditional lenders to downscale their services in the form of Village and Township Banks, and there are also over 8,000 microcredit companies (MCCs) across the country. In spite of this encouraging growth, however, the policy environment for inclusive finance in China ranks 42nd in the EIU’s 2014 Global Microscope.

Many of the Chinese institutions engaged in inclusive lending could benefit from third-party feedback on how to scale their operations – exactly the kind of feedback ratings provide. Supervisors would also benefit from the best practices and experiences of other MFIs. If history in Latin America provides any lessons, perhaps specialized ratings for microfinance operations in China could form the next crucial step in the sustainable development of the sector.

However, as the PlaNet Finance China report clarifies, comparing the history of ratings undertaken globally to those recently done in China is a complex exercise. China faces unique developmental conditions in using ratings for microfinance:

• MFIs in China so far have only undergone superficial credit ratings performed by mainstream domestic agencies, as mandated by central government leaders trying to make sense of a complex market. These agencies spend minimal time on site, and given their generalized approach, do not provide deep feedback or insight to the young financial institutions.
• The responsibility of implementing these pilot rating projects is devolved to provincial offices of financial affairs (POFAs). While ratings should stay “local” given China’s provincial diversity, these POFAs perform ratings as mandated by central authorities and they do not share their findings with each other. Central coordination when rating and evaluating these new institutions will be key in defining national benchmarks for the industry.
• Ratings have not armed Chinese MFIs and MCCs with increased access to debt funding, a concern further exacerbated by the fact that foreign investors with interest in microfinance have difficulties investing in the Chinese market. In contrast, non-banking financial institutions globally have enjoyed easier access to debt funding and preferential policy treatment as a result of ratings, making them a worthwhile value-added exercise that garners industry support and boosts capacity building. Mainstream rating pilots in China’s microfinance sector have not so far delivered these kinds of benefits.

There’s much that ratings can do for the robust growth of microfinance. However, the sector is still emerging in China, and fragmented coordination of surface rating pilots do not yet offer Chinese players the benefits needed for increased growth. The new report hopes to mediate that missing knowledge and provoke discussion on the part of stakeholders.

To read the report, click here.

Image credit: Harald Groven

Have you read?

Ratings to Loosen the Regulatory Noose on China’s Microcredit Companies

How Client Protection and Ratings Work Together

Gender Dynamics in Rural China Illuminate the Need for Financial Education

Huimin Microcredit client engaging in budgeting exercise

Poor rural women in China face challenges not dissimilar to poor rural women in other developing countries. Many are homemakers and child rearers, with much of their work tied to the home, offering little social or professional mobility. However, there are some dynamics in China that make women’s conditions somewhat different. The Communist Revolution of 1949 promulgated an ideology that favored gender equality and claimed women “hold up half the sky” (半边天). According to a recent study by the World Economic Forum, gender inequality is more apparent in the developed economies of Japan and Italy than in China. Modern China’s One-Child Policy, however, leads to a cultural view that “values males and belittles females” (重男轻女). The fact that China’s gender ratio skews towards males may support this view and suggest that parents favor males. Additionally, China’s massive urbanization continues to create large flows of migrant workers, posing other challenges for women. Husbands often find work in neighboring provinces or eastern coastal cities, leaving their wives to manage the household’s finances and run the family business independently.

The management of household finances offers an interesting vantage point for considering not only gender equality in China, but also the opportunity to empower women through financial training. This forms the logic behind a financial education project PlaNet Finance China (PFC) is currently implementing. Supported by Diageo’s Plan W program (which supports non-profit projects that advance women’s empowerment), the project provides rural women in China with financial education to promote their ownership over household economic decision-making, thereby delivering empowerment. PlaNet Finance China works with Huimin Microcredit Company, a vanguard of rural microfinance in China, to embed light touch financial education for women throughout their lending practices. Instead of classroom-style seminars, PFC and Diageo designed a series of innovative tools for use at the MFI and at home including interactive budgeting e-calendars and “choose your own [financial] adventure” style readers. Huimin is an ideal distribution channel, given its 90 percent female client base. Most rural MFIs share this characteristic, whereas urban MFIs are more gender neutral.

When we spoke with one woman who makes economic decisions in the household, she said: “My husband, he oversees all of it, he makes the decisions. But I have to calculate and manage those decisions myself. ”

This woman is a mother of three, with her own plot of land whose corn crops she single-handedly manages in order to afford schooling for her children, house repairs, and food. She has decided to borrow money from a local microfinance institution, with a signed contract in her name. A conversation between her and her loan officer reveals why the microfinance institution lends directly to her:

Client: “Why is it always women that sign these forms and not the men?”

Loan Officer: “Because women are tied to the land. Their husbands make the majority of income necessary to support the family, but they must leave the village to find work, and pose more of a risk for us when it comes to collecting interest payments or avoiding a loan-default scenario. Their wives must stay to raise the children, manage the household, and work in the fields. They are less of a risk for us.”

Loan officer reviewing financial exercises with clients

Financial Inclusion through Financial Education

What’s illuminating here is the fact that, due to women being unable to move, this MFI seems to “trust” them with microloans more than men. This may suggest that with the right skills and training, women that sign microloan contracts could not just be doing more for their families, but could also be bigger contributors to the country’s economy, which is soon set to be the world’s largest. Yet, even with such a vital global economy, the Chinese population is not very financially literate. In a 2012 study by Visa, China ranked 14^th out of 27 countries in financial literacy, behind countries like Belarus and Bosnia. In the same study, China ranked 18^th out of 27 in household budgeting practices. With the right financial training, women in China, especially in rural areas, could emerge with an important role in building financial inclusion.

But what is the right financial training? Women in rural China, similar to the rural poor in other regions of the world, already seem to be adept at managing finances. As Portfolios of the Poor shows us, many impoverished people lead complex financial lives and make use of both formal and informal tools. However, for rural women in China, their financial understanding could be more standardized and context-relevant. In Ningxia province, for example, where farm land is recovering from desertification, income from agriculture can be unreliable as can the wages from migrant labor that men pursue. Both amount and frequency of remittances from husbands can be in flux. Such irregularities in money flows make particular lessons in formal financial education, such as investment diversification, more critical. Compared to other markets, interestingly, lessons in savings are not as helpful to China’s rural clients. Chinese culture already champions savings habits. And lessons in mobile banking, while intriguing and innovative, don’t have the same immediacy given a lack of sophisticated telecommunications infrastructure in China’s rural areas.

The experiences of the rural Huimin microfinance institution in China, as well as distinct gaps in financial knowledge, show us that there is a big opportunity in advancing financial inclusion in the country starting with financial training for women who are the principal recipients of microloans and ultimately the ones who manage many household budgets. If women continue to be rurally isolated, knowledge and service deprived, and “tied to the land,” then financial inclusion can start with them.

Have you read?

Ratings to Loosen the Regulatory Noose on China’s Microcredit Companies

Designing Financial Services for China’s Marginalized

China’s Microfinance Landscape: Nonprofits, Microcredit Companies, Rural Financers, and Alibaba

The Investing in Inclusive Finance program at the Center for Financial Inclusion at Accion explores the practices of investors in inclusive finance. Across areas including risk, governance, stakeholder alignment, and fund management, this blog series highlights what’s being done to help the industry better utilize private capital to develop financial institutions that incorporate social aims.

Before the advent of the People’s Bank of China’s county-level pilot program to create microcredit companies (MCCs) and village and township banks (VTBs), there was a large number of unbanked individuals and micro-entrepreneurs whom commercial banks were unwilling to serve. Hence when the pilot program to create MCCs, the product of a financial inclusion plan by the Chinese government, went into action in 2005 the number of MCCs boomed, and in the past few years they have mushroomed to an astounding number of 9,000 as of 2013. The Chinese financial sector has been plagued with corruption in the past few years – for example, the Wu Ying private lending network scandal and the Qilu commercial bank forgery in Shandong. To circumvent corruption and maintain control of the increasingly overpopulated sector, regulators enforce strict capital requirements and caps on interest rates. However, these requirements are stifling the operational sustainability of these MCCs. Joe Zhang, author of the book Inside China’s Shadow Banking: the New Sub-prime Crisis? writes, “The regulation is killing the dynamism of the sector. Everyone in the sector is working extra hard to make a modest return (after huge expenses and bad debts).”

Should 9,000 MCCs all be painted with the same regulatory brush?

Some industry leaders believe a rating system for microcredit companies is the answer. Liu Ping, Director General of the Senior Advisors of the People’s Bank of China, believes ratings can be a yardstick to measure the sustainability of microcredit companies and differentiate the good apples from the bad. MCC investors hope that high grades based on credible ratings could move the authorities to loosen restrictions on outlets, so that business costs could be better covered, individual company branches could grow, and the sector could eventually be made more sustainable. Conversely, low rating grades would expose institutions with questionable practices that require operational changes. In addition, a ratings system may change the popular perception that these institutions are “loan sharks”, leading to increased investment, institutional growth, and client outreach.

Rating systems – a staple of the traditional finance sector – play an important role in microfinance globally. Rating agencies select and weigh indicators for both companies issuing debt and the debt instruments, setting benchmarks for the industry and allowing for factors of comparison amongst companies. Rating reports create access to the risk analysis of debt and debt issuers, increasing market transparency and facilitating investors in sourcing investments, performing credit decisions, and supervising risk. For investees, monitoring of issuers of debt instruments encourages issuers to act in the interests of the investor community which leads to best management practices.

Currently, there are seven approved rating companies in China. Two of these companies are joint ventures with international credit rating agencies – Lianhe Credit with Fitch and Chengxin Credit with Moody’s. Chinese rating companies commonly perceive that getting an accurate picture of MCC operations is unfeasible due to the rather unreliable nature of financial reporting amongst Chinese MCCs, rendering traditional rating methods bogus. Currently, no single regulator has all the data needed to form a comprehensive picture of an MCC. Instead, they advocate a market based approach. If markets can ascertain reliable information, then ratings systems can be built around these indicators. Lianhe Credit applies this market-based approach by performing credit investigation instead of ratings. “The main utility for us is to help the provincial-level supervisors construct information systems that can give them a better grasp on the target MCC’s operations,” says Lianhe’s CIO, Shi XX. The Provincial Office of Financial Affairs in each province, which were abruptly tasked with the duty of regulating MCCs in May 2008, are dedicating energy and time to rating systems. Even if policy restrictions aren’t loosened, MCCs and financial affairs offices now have new management and supervision tools to supplement standard reporting and provide greater clarity to investors.

From the outset, there has been heated debate over the methodologies and goals of a microfinance rating system. Ed Wu, Managing Director of PlaNet Finance China suggests that the most common risk factors in determining sustainability are governance, strategy, risk management skills, IT systems, and funding. The importance of effective risk governance is also emphasized in Governing Banks: MFI Edition by CFI’s Running with Risk project. These risk factors should be taken into account when developing new rating schemas.

When overburdened with companies to regulate, Provincial Offices of Financial Affairs (POFA) may be inclined to use ratings to single out non-compliant MCCs or MCCs with poor risk management in order to revoke business licenses and closely supervise operations. The provinces with the greatest numbers of MCCs urgently need the ability to differentiate among them and are working quickly to establish a ratings infrastructure. Some areas, such as Tianjin, already require a yearly rating report and audit report to be submitted to the local POFA. Additionally, in Jiangsu, Inner Mongolia, and Yunan, POFAs either own state-owned enterprises that do ratings or have internal rating standards and schemes for regulatory purposes.

The concept of ratings for MCCs is taking off and may enable regulators to relax the regulatory noose strangling strong MCCs, whilst reining in MCCs with less than ideal operations. To learn more about this topic, please look out for the joint report by PlaNet Rating and PlaNet Finance coming out in the first quarter of 2014, written with the support of the Credit Suisse microfinance capacity building initiative.

Have you read?

Emerging Risks on China’s Path Toward Financial Inclusion

Designing Financial Services for China’s Marginalized

A Journey to Understanding Risk as a New Board Director in “Governing Banks MFI Edition”

Much of the financial world’s attention is directed at China and the global impact of fluctuations in its banking and financial markets. Last week saw a sharp increase in the country’s short-term borrowing costs, and a record high in the country’s interbank (bank-to-bank) overnight rate – a rate that serves as a gauge of liquidity in a market. In a statement published on Monday, the People’s Bank of China asserted that the liquidity in the country’s banking system overall is at a reasonable level, but emphasized that financial institutions need to improve “awareness about preventing risks.”

Turning with impeccable timing to China’s small and micro lending sector, last week PlaNet Finance released its latest research report, Emerging Risks on China’s Path Towards Financial Inclusion.

China first began experimenting with microfinance in the late 1990’s, much later than many other countries. Since then, in part due to a policy environment aimed at supporting rural area and small enterprise development, the industry has grown rapidly, with over 6,000 microcredit companies as of June 2012. At this time of counting, only 25 percent of these companies had operating histories of longer than three years, and only 50 percent longer than two years. Of China’s current population of over 1.3 billion, an estimated 400-500 million live on only two dollars a day. As China’s microfinance industry continues to grow and serve more individuals, effective risk management becomes increasingly important. The PlaNet Finance report reviews the development of the Chinese microfinance sector and identifies four pertinent industry risk areas.

• Many microcredit companies mainly focus on credit risk, without reference to other risks, such as governance risk, external risk, operations risk, IT systems risk, and liquidity risk
• Restrictions in access to funding create obstacles for the scaling-up of operations
• Emerging market leaders are beginning to face the risks inherent in a rapid expansion strategy, including the challenges of maintaining control and standardization, particularly as portfolio monitoring, risk management, and IT systems have not kept pace with the increasing scale and complexity of operations
• A disproportionately fast increase in lending volume in certain urban markets raises concerns about potential future risks regarding market overcrowding, over-indebtedness, and inadequate consumer protection

The report is part of the Microfinance Robustness Program, an initiative of PlaNet Finance in partnership with the Credit Suisse Microfinance Capacity Building Initiative. The program is focused on upgrading risk management as a necessary foundation for the industry’s sustainable growth, with a focus on China. The program produces and disseminates research, trainings, and tools. Along with the report, the program released a credit risk dashboard tool for MFIs last week. The tool, available to download here, visualizes the credit risk exposure of an MFI.

Image credit: Microfinance Robustness Program

Have you read?

Designing Financial Services for China’s Marginalized

The “Lucky Three”: Tailored Products for the Rural Poor in China

Banana Skins 2012: Overindebtedness Tops the Risk Charts