<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard Questions about Interest Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/05/24/hard-questions-about-interest-rates-%e2%80%9cwhat-is-a-fair-price-to-pay-for-good-credit%e2%80%9d-session-take-aways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cfi-blog.org/2010/05/24/hard-questions-about-interest-rates-%e2%80%9cwhat-is-a-fair-price-to-pay-for-good-credit%e2%80%9d-session-take-aways/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getaneh Gobezie</title>
		<link>http://cfi-blog.org/2010/05/24/hard-questions-about-interest-rates-%e2%80%9cwhat-is-a-fair-price-to-pay-for-good-credit%e2%80%9d-session-take-aways/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Getaneh Gobezie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 04:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centerforfinancialinclusionblog.wordpress.com/?p=1670#comment-609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Colleagues,

Yes! This is (and I believe would remain to be) one of the most important discussion in the industry -- HOW MUCH INTEREST IS TOO MUCH?

I strongly agree that this should depend on CONTEXT. Yet, some would like to give a rough approximation that can work for &#039;ALL CONTEXTS&#039;. The best reference to this I think is what Dr. Muhammed Yunus proposed quite recently. He said:

&#039;&#039;Cost of money plus 10%, that was the acceptable &quot;green zone&quot; of business. Cost of money plus 15%, and you were entering the yellow zone, bordering on being questionable. More than 15% over the cost of money, and he had no doubts - that was the red zone.&#039;&#039;

Perhaps the most difficult question is -- MFIs need to expand outreach, and unless these costs are covered by a donor, or a grant, they have to be met from the accumulated surplus that an MFI has built up from the total interest rate paid by customers net of the costs. This involves a choice between current and future clients (or even generations). Should the current clients suffer from higher interest in order to sustain the service to &#039;future&#039; clients (or future generation)?

We have had a number of discussion on this, and it is really a complex complex one. I have summerized such issues in a paper posted at the microfinancegateway.org (recommended papers list) titled 

SUSTAINABLE RURALFINANCE: PROSPECTS, CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS. 

This paper can be viewed using the following link:

http://www.microfinancegateway.org/p/site/m/template.rc/1.11.49870/

Looking forward to hearing from you all.

rgrds

Getaneh Gobezie
tele: 251-911-092033]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Colleagues,</p>
<p>Yes! This is (and I believe would remain to be) one of the most important discussion in the industry &#8212; HOW MUCH INTEREST IS TOO MUCH?</p>
<p>I strongly agree that this should depend on CONTEXT. Yet, some would like to give a rough approximation that can work for &#8216;ALL CONTEXTS&#8217;. The best reference to this I think is what Dr. Muhammed Yunus proposed quite recently. He said:</p>
<p>&#8221;Cost of money plus 10%, that was the acceptable &#8220;green zone&#8221; of business. Cost of money plus 15%, and you were entering the yellow zone, bordering on being questionable. More than 15% over the cost of money, and he had no doubts &#8211; that was the red zone.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps the most difficult question is &#8212; MFIs need to expand outreach, and unless these costs are covered by a donor, or a grant, they have to be met from the accumulated surplus that an MFI has built up from the total interest rate paid by customers net of the costs. This involves a choice between current and future clients (or even generations). Should the current clients suffer from higher interest in order to sustain the service to &#8216;future&#8217; clients (or future generation)?</p>
<p>We have had a number of discussion on this, and it is really a complex complex one. I have summerized such issues in a paper posted at the microfinancegateway.org (recommended papers list) titled </p>
<p>SUSTAINABLE RURALFINANCE: PROSPECTS, CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS. </p>
<p>This paper can be viewed using the following link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microfinancegateway.org/p/site/m/template.rc/1.11.49870/" rel="nofollow">http://www.microfinancegateway.org/p/site/m/template.rc/1.11.49870/</a></p>
<p>Looking forward to hearing from you all.</p>
<p>rgrds</p>
<p>Getaneh Gobezie<br />
tele: 251-911-092033</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
