<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life&#8217;s daily annoyances</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/01/08/lifes-daily-annoyances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cfi-blog.org/2010/01/08/lifes-daily-annoyances/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Burgess</title>
		<link>http://cfi-blog.org/2010/01/08/lifes-daily-annoyances/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Burgess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centerforfinancialinclusionblog.wordpress.com/?p=1273#comment-369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I follow with interest the flow of information about the state of the economy and society and all its aspects ... and am usually left wondering how to drill down to the issues posed by the information being circulated. In the case of the &quot;Irritants&quot; referred to, it is interesting to see the summary set out in the graphic ... but how has this changed over time ... from 1950, decade by decade until 2010 ... and what does this show about the decision making in the society. 

And how do these data change from place to place ... how does the profile change between different countries! How does the profile change between different cities ... different communities ... different types of communities. 

I argue that if data were organized efficiently, it would be possible to get these answers really easily ... they would be a click away! 

When well organized, these data become interesting as a basis for understanding the priorities in a specific community and the interventions that make the most sense in this community ... then change or progress may be associated with the set of interventions ... and performance association with each intervention as well. 

All of this is being incorporated into the Community Analytics (CA) framework. CA includes profiles of standard values that are computed in part using concepts of the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)

With regard to predatory lending, questionable loans and the recent global financial crisis ... I see these as being associated in some way ... but what caused these things and what might be the key to assuring that these matters do not get resurface again in another guise. Better informed clients would help ... so more financial literacy is not a bad thing ... but in my view it will not help very much unless some other things change as well. The underlying driver of the prevailing market based economic system is human greed, and manifested most in the greed of large powerful organizations. Where there is profit potential that will create personal or organizational wealth, there will be action ... and yes ... transparency about this would be healthy, but it will never happen under the prevailing system of law, rules, reporting, oversight, regulation and incentives. 

In the CA framework the flow of money transactions that produce profit and money wealth are documented as much as possible ... but the impact of these activities on the social value consumption, value creation and value change in the community are also documented. When there is value adding in the community ... the incentive of profit is doing a good job ... but when there is value destruction in the community, then profit is not serving society, but merely the individual and/or the organization. 

The approaches being used to assess MFI performance and the impact of an MFI&#039;s work need to be supplemented, in my view, by some metrics that relate to the progress of the community. Part of the CA hypothesis is that progress results from a balanced multi-sector portfolio of initiatives, of which microfinance is part, but only part. 

I am interested in this discussion ... these discussions, and starting to share the CA with concepts with others who have similar interests. 

Peter Burgess
www.communityanalytics.org .... SOON!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow with interest the flow of information about the state of the economy and society and all its aspects &#8230; and am usually left wondering how to drill down to the issues posed by the information being circulated. In the case of the &#8220;Irritants&#8221; referred to, it is interesting to see the summary set out in the graphic &#8230; but how has this changed over time &#8230; from 1950, decade by decade until 2010 &#8230; and what does this show about the decision making in the society. </p>
<p>And how do these data change from place to place &#8230; how does the profile change between different countries! How does the profile change between different cities &#8230; different communities &#8230; different types of communities. </p>
<p>I argue that if data were organized efficiently, it would be possible to get these answers really easily &#8230; they would be a click away! </p>
<p>When well organized, these data become interesting as a basis for understanding the priorities in a specific community and the interventions that make the most sense in this community &#8230; then change or progress may be associated with the set of interventions &#8230; and performance association with each intervention as well. </p>
<p>All of this is being incorporated into the Community Analytics (CA) framework. CA includes profiles of standard values that are computed in part using concepts of the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)</p>
<p>With regard to predatory lending, questionable loans and the recent global financial crisis &#8230; I see these as being associated in some way &#8230; but what caused these things and what might be the key to assuring that these matters do not get resurface again in another guise. Better informed clients would help &#8230; so more financial literacy is not a bad thing &#8230; but in my view it will not help very much unless some other things change as well. The underlying driver of the prevailing market based economic system is human greed, and manifested most in the greed of large powerful organizations. Where there is profit potential that will create personal or organizational wealth, there will be action &#8230; and yes &#8230; transparency about this would be healthy, but it will never happen under the prevailing system of law, rules, reporting, oversight, regulation and incentives. </p>
<p>In the CA framework the flow of money transactions that produce profit and money wealth are documented as much as possible &#8230; but the impact of these activities on the social value consumption, value creation and value change in the community are also documented. When there is value adding in the community &#8230; the incentive of profit is doing a good job &#8230; but when there is value destruction in the community, then profit is not serving society, but merely the individual and/or the organization. </p>
<p>The approaches being used to assess MFI performance and the impact of an MFI&#8217;s work need to be supplemented, in my view, by some metrics that relate to the progress of the community. Part of the CA hypothesis is that progress results from a balanced multi-sector portfolio of initiatives, of which microfinance is part, but only part. </p>
<p>I am interested in this discussion &#8230; these discussions, and starting to share the CA with concepts with others who have similar interests. </p>
<p>Peter Burgess<br />
<a href="http://www.communityanalytics.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.communityanalytics.org</a> &#8230;. SOON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
